Home
Acerca de las Toolbox | Atrás | Imprimir | Adelante
 

Standard IARC degrees of evidence

 

 

of carcinogenicity :

  • in humans

  • in experimental animals

    which are the basis for the Standard IARC Classification


  • Carcinogenicity in humans

    Sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity:

    The Working Group considers that a causal relationship has been established between exposure to the agent, mixture or exposure circumstance and human cancer. That is, a positive relationship has been observed between the exposure and cancer in studies in which chance, bias and confounding could be ruled out with reasonable confidence.

    | Back |

    Limited evidence of carcinogenicity:

    A positive association has been observed between exposure to the agent, mixture or exposure circumstance and cancer for which a causal interpretation is considered by the Working Group to be credible, but chance, bias or confounding could not be ruled out with reasonable confidence.

    | Back |

     

    Inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity:

    The available studies are of insufficient quality, consistency or statistical power to permit a conclusion regarding the presence or absence of a causal association between exposure and cancer, or no data on cancer in humans are available.

    | Back |

     

    Evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity:

    There are several adequate studies covering the full range of levels of exposure that human beings are known to encounter, which are mutually consistent in not showing a positive association between exposure to the agent, mixture or exposure circumstance and any studied cancer at any observed level of exposure. A conclusion of 'evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity' is inevitably limited to the cancer sites, conditions and levels of exposure and length of observation covered by the available studies. In addition, the possibility of a very small risk at the levels of exposure studied can never be excluded.

    In some instances, the above categories may be used to classify the degree of evidence related to carcinogenicity in specific organs or tissues.

    | Back |

     

     

    Carcinogenicity in experimental animals

    Sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity:

    The Working Group considers that a causal relationship has been established between the agent or mixture and an increased incidence of malignant neoplasms or of an appropriate combination of benign and malignant neoplasms in (a) two or more species of animals or (b) in two or more independent studies in one species carried out at different times or in different laboratories or under different protocols.

    Exceptionally, a single study in one species might be considered to provide sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity when malignant neoplasms occur to an unusual degree with regard to incidence, site, type of tumour or age at onset.

    | Back |

     

    Limited evidence of carcinogenicity:

    The data suggest a carcinogenic effect but are limited for making a definitive evaluation because, e.g. (a) the evidence of carcinogenicity is restricted to a single experiment; or (b) there are unresolved questions regarding the adequacy of the design, conduct or interpretation of the study; or (c) the agent or mixture increases the incidence only of benign neoplasms or lesions of uncertain neoplastic potential, or of certain neoplasms which may occur spontaneously in high incidences in certain strains.

    | Back |

     

    Inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity:

    The studies cannot be interpreted as showing either the presence or absence of a carcinogenic effect because of major qualitative or quantitative limitations, or no data on cancer in experimental animals are available.

    | Back |

     

    Evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity:

    Adequate studies involving at least two species are available which show that, within the limits of the tests used, the agent or mixture is not carcinogenic. A conclusion of evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity is inevitably limited to the species, tumour sites and levels of exposure studied.

     

     
    Source: IARC External linkChapter 12 (evaluation) of the Preamble to the IARC Monographs

     
      Atrás | Imprimir | Adelante Arriba
    27-Mar-2008